Apparently when the government says you are not, and a private trade association claims ownership of the word 'Engineer'.

Many engineers and engineering organizations throughout the State of Illinois and the country are fearfully watching this case.  Its outcome could set a precedent that could result in hundreds of thousands of otherwise qualified engineers being unable to earn a living from their chosen career.

Chuck Murray, Senior Technical Editor at Design News, writes about this bizarre case in his recent article, "Are You An Engineer If You Don't Pass The P.E.?"  "During the course of his 55-year career, Burton Siegal has assembled a resume that would be the envy of most design engineers....Unfortunately for Siegal, the state of Illinois isn't sure he deserves to be called an engineer. Because Siegal isn't a certified Professional Engineer (P.E.), the state's Department of Financial & Professional Regulation is investigating him for the unlicensed practice of engineering......Illinois has asked him to "show cause" to prevent it from levying a "cease and desist" order that would stop Siegal from using the term "engineer" or "engineering" on his business card or in his company's name. "

[Note PE desginates a Professional Engineer, a credential available to those who elect to take the Professional Engineering Exam, a test designed and administered by a private trade association]

Although the University of Illinois has recognized Siegal as a distinguished alumni, if the Society of Professional Engineering and the State of Illinois have their way, his, and every engineer's degree will become meaningless, as the actual credential to call oneself an engineer will be dependent upon passing a private association's test.

According to Manpower's 2009 Talent Shortage Survey, engineers are among the top five positions employers have the most trouble filling.  For a private trade association to engage in a power grab to try and prevent fully qualified individuals from practicing their chosen profession is an outrage.  The claiming of "ownership" of the term engineer raises significant Constitutional free speech issues.  The impact of this case and it's potential to cripple the engineering profession will have a direct and chilling effect on America's global competitiveness. 

Siegal may well not outlive the appeals that will be required if the State deems that he is not 'qualified' to call himself or work as an engineer.  This is despite his university degree, 55 year career, high level government security clearance, dozens of industry awards and lack of a single product liability case for any product Siegal has ever designed.

Please visit the CONTACT page to send an email with your support and for information on making a donation to Siegal's legal defense fund.